Conspiracy theorists who claim that the conclusions of scientists can be bought, are acknowledging that those scientific opinions have value, while spreading their own theories for nothing because that is all they are worth.
Conspiracy theorists who claim that the conclusions of scientists can be bought, are acknowledging that those scientific opinions have value, while spreading their own theories for nothing because that is all they are worth.
Comments
[deleted]
/u/cruiserman_80 has flaired this post as a musing.
Musings are expected to be high-quality and thought-provoking, but not necessarily as unique as showerthoughts.
If this post is poorly written, unoriginal, or rule-breaking, please report it.
Otherwise, please add your comment to the discussion!
^^This ^^is ^^an ^^automated ^^system.
^^If ^^you ^^have ^^any ^^questions, ^^please ^^use ^^this ^^link ^^to ^^message ^^the ^^moderators.
I think your shower ran out of hot water.
Best way to disprove a scientist is with science.
But that takes work and can’t be said on a podcast carelessly.
Of course they have value, big companies sell billions worth of stuff with paid scientific opinions.
What are you trying to say? I should charge for my conspiracy theories to make them more valid? That’s against the point of it all. I hate the world where truth is controlled by money.
I mean they have value because they’re followed, to give the counterpoint. It’d be saying that, in a theocracy, bribing priests prove that priests hold power.
Although the conclusions of scientists do have value, still good shower thought.
I’m not agreeing with all conspiracy theorists, but are you suggesting that all studies are ironclad and not agenda-driven/paid for? Because I feel like believing that is more of a stretch than anything else
If the last ten years has shown us anything it is that all conspiracy theories are true