India is estimated to have 180 warheads while Pakistan is estimated to have 170.
Largest test conducted by India was 45 kT, while Pakistan’s was 40 kT. India claims to be capable of producing 200 kT warheads. For comparison, Hiroshima bomb was 15 kT, Minuteman (USA) yield is 170 kT and Topol-M (Russia) is up to 800 kT and Peacekeeper (USA) has 10 warheads, each 300 kT.
Risk of fallout – guaranteed within India and Pakistan, won’t significantly impact anywhere outside India and Pakistan, except regions very close to the border. USA and Europe are safe.
Dont think the fallout would be a nuclear war… India fired missiles and killed civilians for which pakistan will launch missiles at india soon as well and that would be the end of it.
Not the first conflict, it happens every time elections are close in India, happened in 2019 as well when india tried to bomb some targets but failed and dropped the bombs on some trees, pakistan responded back then too and bombed some military sites, downed 2 indian fighter jets and captured and indian pilot named Abhinandan.
This time india has killed ppl because of which the response would have to be bigger.
India operates a nuclear triad similar in principle to those of the US and Russia, though much smaller and less diverse. It has around 180 warheads, most of which are intended for delivery by plane launched cruise missile. It also operates truck-mounted ICBMs and a single nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarine.
It is generally accepted that India can produce hydrogen bombs. The most powerful tested had a yield of around 60kt. Officially, India claims to be readily able to produce weapons of around a 200kt yield, which is a mid-sized hydrogen bomb.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Pakistani nuclear programme is very similar to the Indian one, but less well developed. It has a range of air and land launch capabilities, but has yet to build a nuclear submarine. It reportedly has about 170 bombs, with slightly lower tested and claimed yields.
Legit they have enough to ruin the world hard if just they exchanged by themselves. They would fuck us after their shitty bitch spit. Any one saying different is a loser bitch that literally has no idea what the fuck they are talking about.
Uh, They’re both estimated to have around 170 nuclear weapons each. Neither country is confirmed to have h-bombs but it’s suspected that India does.
India declared a no-first-use policy in regards to nukes back in the 1990’s.
Both India and Pakistan have joined the conventions to disarm and ban chemical and biological weapons after the cold war. Egypt, North Korea, South Sudan, and Israel are the only countries who refuse to rule out this kind of weaponry.
All nukes create local fallout that’s dangerous. And most nukes, depending on some factors, can create fallout that spreads in the weather. Potassium iodide, a stock supply of clean water for washing, and enough resources to stay indoors for days are how you can prepare to survive some fallout.
A whole nuclear halocaust use to seem unlikely to me, but now days I do worry that just a few too many bombs could start a mass fishing famine that would be globally disastrous in an apocalyptic way.
Basically, if India and Pakistan engage in a nuclear war, the whole world is fucked. You only need about 70 to 80 nuclear weapons (depending on the size) to launch the world into a nuclear winter.
Comments
India is estimated to have 180 warheads while Pakistan is estimated to have 170.
Largest test conducted by India was 45 kT, while Pakistan’s was 40 kT. India claims to be capable of producing 200 kT warheads. For comparison, Hiroshima bomb was 15 kT, Minuteman (USA) yield is 170 kT and Topol-M (Russia) is up to 800 kT and Peacekeeper (USA) has 10 warheads, each 300 kT.
Risk of fallout – guaranteed within India and Pakistan, won’t significantly impact anywhere outside India and Pakistan, except regions very close to the border. USA and Europe are safe.
Dont think the fallout would be a nuclear war… India fired missiles and killed civilians for which pakistan will launch missiles at india soon as well and that would be the end of it.
Not the first conflict, it happens every time elections are close in India, happened in 2019 as well when india tried to bomb some targets but failed and dropped the bombs on some trees, pakistan responded back then too and bombed some military sites, downed 2 indian fighter jets and captured and indian pilot named Abhinandan.
This time india has killed ppl because of which the response would have to be bigger.
India operates a nuclear triad similar in principle to those of the US and Russia, though much smaller and less diverse. It has around 180 warheads, most of which are intended for delivery by plane launched cruise missile. It also operates truck-mounted ICBMs and a single nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarine.
It is generally accepted that India can produce hydrogen bombs. The most powerful tested had a yield of around 60kt. Officially, India claims to be readily able to produce weapons of around a 200kt yield, which is a mid-sized hydrogen bomb.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Pakistani nuclear programme is very similar to the Indian one, but less well developed. It has a range of air and land launch capabilities, but has yet to build a nuclear submarine. It reportedly has about 170 bombs, with slightly lower tested and claimed yields.
Enough to hurt everything
[removed]
Legit they have enough to ruin the world hard if just they exchanged by themselves. They would fuck us after their shitty bitch spit. Any one saying different is a loser bitch that literally has no idea what the fuck they are talking about.
Uh, They’re both estimated to have around 170 nuclear weapons each. Neither country is confirmed to have h-bombs but it’s suspected that India does.
India declared a no-first-use policy in regards to nukes back in the 1990’s.
Both India and Pakistan have joined the conventions to disarm and ban chemical and biological weapons after the cold war. Egypt, North Korea, South Sudan, and Israel are the only countries who refuse to rule out this kind of weaponry.
All nukes create local fallout that’s dangerous. And most nukes, depending on some factors, can create fallout that spreads in the weather. Potassium iodide, a stock supply of clean water for washing, and enough resources to stay indoors for days are how you can prepare to survive some fallout.
A whole nuclear halocaust use to seem unlikely to me, but now days I do worry that just a few too many bombs could start a mass fishing famine that would be globally disastrous in an apocalyptic way.
That’s not to ask who would back them. You children don’t understand it. Haven’t been old enough or just don’t care.
As far as i know it’s the kind that goes boom.
I cant wait for fallout season 2, season 1 was so good.
Big booms kind.
People vastly overestimate the damage the nukes would do to the wider globe because of things like terminator.
Basically, if India and Pakistan engage in a nuclear war, the whole world is fucked. You only need about 70 to 80 nuclear weapons (depending on the size) to launch the world into a nuclear winter.