Do these 2 clauses prove my apartment amenities are a contractual right?

r/

Location: Michigan

Hi I signed a lease based on how they marketed their fitness center as a “big deal”. They later restricted
me from this amenity without cause. When reviewing my lease their is no language about “revoking amenities without cause” or stating explicitly that this amenity is not a contractual right like some leases have. There are only these two relevant clauses:

  1. Parking space(s), laundry facilities, recreational facilities, bicycle racks, storage areas, or any other facilities which do not constitute part of the Premises shall be deemed gratuitously furnished by Landlord, and the use of such facilities shall be expressly conditioned on compliance
    with Lease Addendums and additional information stored online in Tenant’s resident portal under Resources pertaining thereto issued by Landlord.

  2. If the Property has a pool and/or exercise room, the pool regulations are posted at the pool area and the exercise room regulations are posted in the exercise room and both shall be obeyed by the Tenant and Tenant’s guests. For safety reasons, residents under the age of 16 must
    be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian

I have 3 questions:

  1. If it is proven that I broke no rules, could I argue a loss of contractual right to this amenity?
  2. Does the fact that they include the conditional statement, bind them to making this amenity available if there was compliance to all available rules?
  3. Because they name the amenity in the lease does this make it a contractual right?

Thanks in advance.

Comments

  1. Rich_Cause5589 Avatar

    Why are they trying to restrict your access to amenities?