As the title says, if the economy was a large reason for trumps win, does this put incumbent governors at risk? or is there a difference? Is NJ at risk of going red? Is Virginia at risk of going blue?
As the title says, if the economy was a large reason for trumps win, does this put incumbent governors at risk? or is there a difference? Is NJ at risk of going red? Is Virginia at risk of going blue?
Comments
The following is a copy of the original post to record the post as it was originally written.
As the title says, if the economy was a large reason for trumps win, does this put incumbent governors at risk? or is there a difference? Is NJ at risk of going red? Is Virginia at risk of going blue?
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
>…if the economy was a large reason for trumps win, does this put incumbent governors at risk? or is there a difference? Is NJ at risk of going red? Is Virginia at risk of going blue?
No. Trump owns inflation now.
If anything, his election makes it more likely that New Jersey and Virginia will elect Democratic governors this year.
NJ and Virginia are most a risk if flipping when a democrat wins the White House because there’s somewhat of a midterm affect.
But Trump owns the economic troubles and they really won’t hurt the Democrats in either race. Virginia in particular is going to be tough for Republicans because a lot of government employees live in Virginia.
I don’t think the Republicans are going to nominate anybody who has a chance in the next election in New Jersey.
The economy could be as good as the 90s and Republicans would think it was a hellscape. Republicans governors will fair as well as propaganda can propel them and Democratic governors will fail as badly as propaganda can defeat them. No outside factors will have any relevance. At all.
I don’t believe that the economy was a big part of Trump’s win.