Real book is better then e-book

r/

Is it just me think that book texture is important. When I reading with e-book just feel like I’m not really reading, i just reading a material or information like reading Wikipedia. Real book is getting fall behind the times but still an important culture heritage for me.

Comments

  1. AutoModerator Avatar

    Please remember what subreddit you are in, this is unpopular opinion. We want civil and unpopular takes and discussion. Any uncivil and ToS violating comments will be removed and subject to a ban. Have a nice day!

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

  2. FeatheredKangaroo Avatar

    I’m sure there are quite literally hundreds of millions that agree with you

  3. Ok-Lychee-2155 Avatar

    Don’t feel that this is unpopular…but once you start a good book on an e-reader it doesn’t matter…

  4. RankedFarting Avatar
    1. *than

    2. This is the popular opinion.

  5. babyboots86 Avatar

    Not unpopular.

  6. fliphat Avatar

    Popular opinion

  7. jackfaire Avatar

    I literally don’t care either way. I just don’t carrying a backpack full of 30 books when I can carry hundreds on my smart phone.

  8. debunk101 Avatar

    The feel and smell of a real book adds to the enjoyment of reading. But e-books are handy for overseas travels.

  9. Ok-Drink-1328 Avatar

    booksmart means “tHe tExTuRe oF A rEaL bOok iS bEtTeR”

    books are obsolete, just doomscroll, you’ll learn more

  10. Confidenceisbetter Avatar

    I think most readers agree but using a kindle is more convenient than lugging around 10 books on vacation and it’s also cheaper to buy ebooks. Personally i moved to a different country by plane and couldn’t waste the little luggage space i had on books so I got a kindle plus i need to save where i can and i’d rather buy ebooks for like 5 bucks than spend 15-20 on the real book.