Second Minor Revision — Advice Needed

r/

Hello everyone,

I’m working on a systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) that underwent a first minor revision and has now been returned for a second minor revision, but for only a single point. The reviewer asked for an additional methodological clarification about the dose used in two out of the four included studies.

For one study, I contacted the author and they replied that they no longer have the information. For the other study, I emailed two authors last Wednesday but have not received a response. I even tried calling overseas, but the operators weren’t able to connect me to them. I also sent a follow-up email yesterday, but still no response, and honestly, I have lost hope that they will reply in time.

My resubmission deadline is May 13.
I’m wondering:

  • How long should I wait before resubmitting?
  • If I resubmit noting that the requested information could not be obtained, how will the reviewer likely react?
  • What happens if I resubmit now but the authors reply after I’ve already submitted?

It’s a bit stressful because I’ve made a serious good-faith effort to retrieve the missing information, but I don’t want this to delay or negatively impact the final decision. Would appreciate any advice or similar experiences. Thanks!

Comments

  1. mckinnos Avatar

    Just be honest-tell the reviewer that you did what they asked but it wasn’t available and you couldn’t get ahold of the authors prior to the revision being due. You made your good faith effort, which is all that can be reasonably
    expected of you.