In DR its Pedernales, area 2,074.53 km2 (800.98 sq mi), Population: 34,375. The entire province is less populated than many neighborhoods in Santo Domingo.
In DR its Pedernales, area 2,074.53 km2 (800.98 sq mi), Population: 34,375. The entire province is less populated than many neighborhoods in Santo Domingo.
Comments
I have no idea. I would say Acre. But im not 100% sure it even exists
Amazon. Probably Acre or Roraima states
The whole country
Yeah, about that…
Treita y Tres 9676km^2 and 47706 people.
Flores is the second least densely populated but has the least population (26271)
The whole country. Argentina’s population density is 17 per km2, the second lowest in Latin America after Bolivia.
Within Argentina, the province with the lowest population density is Santa Cruz, with 1.12 inhabitants per km2.
Anything from the Río Negro para arriba.
Everything outside central valley.
States: Roraima (population 708,325, area 224.273km2, density 6,6 sq mi), Amazonas (population 3,941,613, area 1,559,159, density 6,7 sqmi), Amapá (population 733,759, area 142,859, density 6,8 sqmi)
Municipalities: Barcelos – AM (population 27,638, area 122,475 km2, density 0,5sqmi), Japurá – AM (population 2,251, area 55,791 km2, 0,5sqmi), Atalaia do Norte – AM (population 20,398, area 76,355, density 0,4sqmi)
Note: all places mentioned are Amazonic ones
Outside Montevideo, Canelones and Maldonado (2.125.861 people in an extension of 9.859 km2) the density of Uruguay is 8,257 (division between 1.373.590 and the 166.356 km2).
Per department the number may be even lower as some compatriot said, Treinta y Tres has the lowest density.
Kalayaan, Palawan (in the middle of the Spratly Islands) has a population density of 1 inhabitant per km2. The second least densely populated municipality is Dinapigue, Isabela, with a population density of 7 inhabitants per km2, which is at the same level as Kazakhstan.
Santa Cruz.
I believe that Aysen has a population density of about 0.9 inhabitants per square kilometer. It is full of islands, mountains, cold, rain, and snow.
https://preview.redd.it/0pha13fng8te1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=833cc811dc8c1fd0be392ace497f4e9cd07710a6
I was going to say Patagonia (Santa Cruz in particular is nearly empty), but then I remembered the Pampas region is pretty sparsely populated too (lots of farmland and nothing else). And then I remembered that pretty much all of the country is like that, our population is very heavily concentrated on a few urban areas.
So that’s my answer: the whole country.
Department of Gracias a Dios
Malvinas Islands
Area: 12,173 km2
Population: 3,794
The autonomous regions of the Caribbean Coast are very sparsely populated. The Area is bigger than Costa Rica but only a little more than 1 million people living in there.
Campos de Hielo norte y Sur supongo, no vive nadie ahi
Vieques because of all the land occupied or polluted by the U.S. Navy. Ceiba because of the mangrove and rain forest and the old naval base. Maricao and Las Marías because of the forests, their location at the edge of the Cordillera Central, and their history as small agricultural settlements.
Baja California Sur, which is somewhat surprising on first impression as it’s the state that houses the touristy cities of La Paz and Los Cabos, but they’re both not very big or have that many people living in them and the rest of the state is quite large and pretty empty.
The state is about 4/5ths of the size of Portugal but has less than 1/10th of the population, lol
Pando = 1,7 hab/km2
Rancagua.
Not but fr it may be the antarctic territory
The whole Amazon region, also the Orinoquia region but this one is carried out by Villavicencio
Amazonas y Bolivar
Baja California Sur