the first one makes people loose most principals or tollerate too much, the second creates extremism and beliefs like “whatever god says is fine, if he says you can take s*xslaves, its ok” (someone acc said that btw). it also looks down on differences of opinion, sometimes but is still ok with some differences between eachother. these faiths generally have more conflict, emperialism, conquest mentalities and hate, but mor principals (though not always right by secular standard) too. they are often the ones that spread across the world through convertions and violence both. thoughts? which is better and why?
Comments
It’s a false premise, because both of these are monotheism.
Believing in magic sky daddies is inherently illogical and cowardly.
Religions aren’t made to make sense.
If I thought any religion made sense I’d be religious. Personally I think a naturalistic universe makes way more sense than any god or religious concept I’m aware of. If you’re only limiting yourself to choosing between certain religions that you’re aware of, you’re not making a choice with all the availible information or choosing from all availible options.
It also shouldn’t matter which one makes more sense to you, it should matter which one is more likely to be true. It’s always seemed so weird to me that people will shop around for a religion and find one they like. If I was going to choose a god to worship or religion to follow, I’d be more concerned with which one seems the most realistically likely to be true regardless of how much I liked it.