Honestly I have this question after watching S6 E4 of Big Mouth (“Rice Purity Test”) where a guy checks off bestiality on his list because he’s had sex with a chicken/turkey but like, as foods. So not alive, obv no head or feathers, I presume cooked? I just wouldn’t have linked that w bestiality, but I guess it technically could be, but I feel like fucking a roast chicken is more like fucking a food vs. an animal, if that makes sense? Like I feel like if someone was sexually attracted to animals, a roast chicken/turkey wouldn’t scratch that itch cause it’s so different from what it’s like when it’s alive/in its “animal” state?
Comments
Yes.
Yeah. You could even scratch off necrophilia as well.
I love that this isn’t the first time this question has been asked on this sub
Alive is way better than dead trust me.
Seems like a waste of good food but at least the animal isn’t being hurt so I don’t care if some does this.
No, the taboo around bestiality is that you are non consensually violating a living thing that can feel pain and suffer. Also there is the risk that it could transmit a disease to you, which could spread. None of that applies if the animal is dead and cooked.
> S6 E4 of Big Mouth (“Rice Purity Test”) where a guy checks off bestiality on his list because he’s had sex with a chicken/turkey but like, as foods
So they canceled Archive 81, Warrior Nun, Inside Job, and virtually every other good show after 1-2 seasons…but this thing gets 6 seasons and dead chickenfucking? 💀
I’m gonna just go take a shit right on someone’s desk. Preferably the right Netflix executive’s. But idk. Night’s young. Many desks to shit on.
Bestial necrophile such a good band name. I think this opens up a larger philosophical discussion about what was once a living breathing animal with consciousness vs prepared food for consumption. At what point does it become food, is it still the dead animal ? Yes obviously but like, do you see the dead bird corpse or do you see a roast? At what point? When it’s a raw chicken? Or when it comes out the oven. When it’s dead but before the feathers, beak, feet etc are removed, when it still has eyes?
Because I feel like fucking a cooked roast chicken is unhinged but fucking a dead pre plucked etc chicken is deranged. But I’d imagine a vegan or someone would have a very different take.
Bro, that’s fowl
Good question, I think no.
Doing a raw bird, albeit dead, hits closer to the violation you mention, but still probably wouldn’t be labeled as such. Doing roast bird is like fucking a watermelon, cuz it’s already food. It’s weird and morally defunct, but not criminal.
Hey look at me, so deep in existential crisis that I put myself through considering things like that
Then consider another approach, where you blend up a roast chicken to make a fleshlight, or use spam as a fleshlight. Is that beastiality?
Bestiality is a too serious term for a situation as ridiculous and awkward as this.
It would be really shitty, but not bestiality.
Lots of people have asked this but the short answer is it is necrobestialty,
To everyone saying yes, I don’t fuck chickens because they’re chickens, I fuck them because they’re perfect as a fleshlight
I don’t think it counts neither as bestiality (as you say) or necrophilia (as the other commenters say). My stepmother is trying to go vegan, and she once told me that most meat eaters (herself included) don’t think a cooked chicken was once a living being. I mean, intelectually we know, but we tend to forget about that fact, because of how separated we are from the killing of that animal. I think that, for you to be a zoophile/necrophile, you need to know and RELISH in the fact you’re fucking an animal/a dead thing, something most meat eaters wouldn’t do because they don’t recognize the chicken as a former living being in the first place.
For example: Dry humping a wooden table would make you a dendrophile? I don’t think so, because you’re not screwing the table because it once was a tree. Same with the cooked chicken.
Okay. Here’s a question to help you answer that question yourself: if a cannibal cooked up a child and fucked the corpse, is that not both pedophilia and necrophilia? Because Id say it still 100% is. Just because the corpse is now intended as food does not change the fact what it once was and what you’re doing to it.
i think the label all depends on the “why”
if someone fucked a roast chicken or whatever just cuz it was something to stick their dick in, i dont think its bestiality or necrophilia.
similar to if someone fucked a jar of peanut butter; like, they COULD have some weird peanut butter fetish, but they probably just wanted to fuck something.
but if the person was fucking the dead bird specifically because it was a bird, or that it was something dead, then we have a different story.
Idk if it’s necrobeastiality because it’s not like it’s the corpse of the animal. Technically yes, but roast chickens don’t look anything like an actual dead chicken would. It fits more the food category imo. But a dead fish with its head from the fish section would be considered necrobeastiality to me
Related question
Yes, and also necrophilia.
I don’t watch Big Mouth because I’ve heard it’s pedophilia, and also because the characters are ugly. This information reinforced my decision not to watch that show.
BRO WHAT THE HELL DO I OPEN REDDIT 2
You seriously fucked a roasted chicken?
No, it is not
I guess it would be considered fucking weird first and foremost